Treatment of Malathion by using Plant-Bacteria Consortia in Constructed Wetlands

Authors

  • Vijiha Nasir Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (BSEAS), Bahria University, H-11 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Rija Khalid Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (BSEAS), Bahria University, H-11 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Asma Jamil Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (BSEAS), Bahria University, H-11 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Sajida Rasheed Department of Biotechnology, University of Kotli Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Kotli, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(62-4)1122

Keywords:

Biodegradation, Organophosphate Pesticide, Colorimetric Analysis, Constructed Wetlands, Plant Microbes, Rhizosphere Interaction, Environmental Sustainability

Abstract

Malathion, a widely used organophosphate pesticide, poses serious environmental and health risks due to its persistence and toxicity. This study investigates the bioremediation potential of bacterial consortia and plant-bacterial systems in constructed wetland settings for the degradation of malathion-contaminated soil at varying concentrations (50, 100, and 200 mg/L). The four consortia (C1-C4) were constructed from three purified soil isolates and mixed in equal proportions and two plant species (Canna indica and Mentha arvensis) were tested individually and in combination over an eight-week period. All isolates were characterized by Gram staining and basic biochemical tests and identified as Gram-positive, catalase-negative Bacillus spp.; species-level molecular identification was not performed. Colorimetric analysis revealed that all bacterial treatments (bacteria + soil) achieved high removal efficiencies, showing degradation rates between 99.2% and 99.78% at 50mg/L and 100mg/L, reaching up to 99.99% at 200 mg/L in seventh week. Plant-based treatments also exhibited robust degradation, achieving up to 99.8% efficiency by the first week and reaching 100% in the third week at higher concentrations. Efficiency was generally higher at greater malathion concentrations, suggesting possible enzyme induction or microbial adaptation. Soil parameter analysis confirmed active microbial and plant-based remediation, with shifts in pH, organic matter, nitrate, sodium, and potassium supporting degradation processes. While bacterial consortia acted more rapidly, plant systems contributed significantly to sustained removal. Two-way ANOVA confirmed significant effects of time and pesticide dose on degradation efficiency across all treatments. Overall, all treatments achieved > 99% malathion degradation, with bacterial and plant-bacterial consortia showing promise as effective, low-cost, and environmentally friendly strategies for remediating pesticide-contaminated soils.

References

1. F.A. Al-Saeed, S.S. Abd-Elghfar, and M.E. Ali. Efficiency of thyme and oregano essential oils in counteracting the hazardous effects of malathion in rats. Animals 14(17): 2497 (2024).

2. S. Uniyal, R.K. Sharma and, V. Kondakal. New insights into the biodegradation of chlorpyrifos by a novel bacterial consortium: process optimization using general factorial experimental design. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 209: 111799 (2021).

3. U.S.E.P. Agency. Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Malathion. U.S. EPA, Washington, DC (2006). https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/web/pdf/malathion-red-revised.pdf

4. U.S.G. Survey. Pesticides in the Nation’s Streams and Ground Water, 1992–2001: The Quality of Our Nation’s Waters. U. S. G. Survey, Washington, DC, USA (2006). https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2005/1291/pdf/circ1291.pdf

5. J. Cui, Y. Wei, J. Jiang, S. Xiao, X. Liu, Z. Zhou, D. Liu, and P. Wang. Bioaccumulation, metabolism and toxicological effects of chiral insecticide malathion and its metabolites in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Chemosphere 318: 137898 (2023).

6. R.W. Lamb, H. McAlexander, C.M. Woodley and M.K. Shukla. Towards a comprehensive understanding of malathion degradation: theoretical investigation of degradation pathways and related kinetics under alkaline conditions. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 23(8): 1231-1241 (2021).

7. S. Vaishali, A. Surendran, and A. Thatheyus. Biodegradation of malathion using Pseudomonas stutzeri (MTCC 2643). Journal of Public Health International 2(4): 8-19 (2020).

8. M.A. Dar and G. Kaushik. Optimizing the malathion degrading potential of a newly isolated Bacillus sp. AGM5 based on Taguchi design of experiment and elucidation of degradation pathway. Biodegradation 33(5): 419-439 (2022).

9. D.G. Karpouzas and B.K. Singh. Microbial degradation of organophosphorus xenobiotics: metabolic pathways and molecular basis. Advances in Microbial Physiology 51: 119-225 (2006).

10. S.R. Geed, M.K. Kureel, A.K. Shukla, R.S Singh, and B.N Rai. Biodegradation of malathion and evaluation of kinetic parameters using three bacterial species. Resource-Efficient Technologies 2: S3-S11 (2016).

11. B. Singh, J. Kaur, and K. Singh. Microbial degradation of an organophosphate pesticide, malathion. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 40(2): 146-154 (2014).

12. S. Olakkaran, A.K. Purayil, A. Antony, S. Mallikarjunaiah, and G.H. Puttaswamygowda. Oxidative stress-mediated genotoxicity of malathion in human lymphocytes. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 849: 503138 (2020).

13. P.L. Bastos, A.F.T.d.L. Bastos, A.d.M. Gurgel, and I.G.D. Gurgel. Carcinogenicidade e mutagenicidade do malathion e seus dois análogos: uma revisão sistemática. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 25(8): 3273-3298 (2020).

14. A.S. Petsas and M.C. Vagi. Trends in the bioremediation of pharmaceuticals and other organic contaminants using native or genetically modified microbial strains: a review. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 20(10): 787-824 (2019).

15. C.I. Cedillo-Herrera, A. Roé-Sosa, A.M. Pat-Espadas, K. Ramírez, J. Rochín-Medina, and L.E. Amabilis-Sosa. Efficient malathion removal in constructed wetlands coupled to UV/H2O2 pretreatment. Applied Sciences 10(15): 5306 (2020).

16. M.A. Dar and G. Kaushik. Biodegradation of malathion in amended soil by indigenous novel bacterial consortia and analysis of degradation pathway. Soil Systems 7(4): 81 (2023).

17. S.R. Geed, M.K. Kureel, B.S. Giri, R.S. Singh, and B.N. Rai. Performance evaluation of Malathion biodegradation in batch and continuous packed bed bioreactor (PBBR). Bioresource Technology 227:56-65 (2017).

18. C. Jimenez-Torres, I. Ortiz, P. San-Martin, and R.I. Hernandez-Herrera. Biodegradation of malathion, α-and β-endosulfan by bacterial strains isolated from agricultural soil in Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 51(12): 853-859 (2016).

19. D. Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, H. Zhang, and J. Hu. A simple colorimetric probe based on anti-aggregation of AuNPs for rapid and sensitive detection of malathion in environmental samples. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 411(12): 2645-2652 (2019).

20. A. Mehta, K.K. Bhardwaj, M. Shaiza, and R. Gupta. Isolation, characterization and identification of pesticide degrading bacteria from contaminated soil for bioremediation. Biologia Futura 72(3): 317-323 (2021).

21. D.K. Sharma, N. Thakur, A. Sharma, and P. Raj. New Spectrophotometric Method for the Analysis of Commercial Malathion Formulation and Its Residues on Some Crop Produces and Environmental Samples. Journal of Advanced Scientific Research 11(02): 131-136 (2020).

22. W.M. Ibrahim, M.A. Karam, R.M. El-Shahat, and A.A. Adway. Biodegradation and utilization of organophosphorus pesticide malathion by cyanobacteria. BioMed Research International 2014(1): 392682 (2014).

23. U.S.F.a.D. Administration. BAM Media M114: Nutrient Broth. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD (2017). https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-media-m114-nutrient-broth

24. J. Reynolds. Media Preparation. LibreTexts/Biology LibreTexts (2021). https://bio.libretexts.org/Learning_Objects/Laboratory_Experiments/Microbiology_Labs/Microbiology_Labs_I/01%3A_Media_Preparation

25. W.R. Henayl. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, USA (1994).

26. T. Aziz, S. Rasheed, A.H. Shah, H. Nasir, A. Fariq, A. Jamil, and S. Jannat. Bioremediation Potential of Plant-Bacterial Consortia for Chlorpyrifos Removal Using Constructed Wetland. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10:880807 (2022).

27. R.S Chandan, N.R Soundaryashree, M.Umesh, A. Neogi, A.S. Aparna, E. Jacob, D. Scaria, and N P. Gana. Analytical Method Development and Validation of Malathion by Uv Spectroscopy. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results 13(08): 2631 (2022).

28. R. Hartline. 1.19: Cytochrome c Oxidase. (2022). https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_Laboratory_Manual_(Hartline)/01:_Labs/1.19:_Cytochrome_c_Oxidase

29. M.T. Madigan, J.M. Martinko, K.S. Bender, D.H. Buckley, D.A. Stahl, and T. Brock (Eds.). Brock Biology of Microorganisms. 14th Edition. Benjamin Cummings (2014).

30. K. Rogers. Gram-negative bacterium. Britannica Editors (2025). https://www.britannica.com/science/Gram-negative-bacterium

31. G. Karki. Difference Between Gram‑Positive and Gram‑Negative Bacteria. (2018). https://www.onlinebiologynotes.com/difference-between-gram-positive-and-gram-negative-bacteria/

32. H. Khatoon, A. Anokhe, and V. Kalia. Catalase test: A biochemical protocol for bacterial identification. AgriCos e-Newsletter 3(1): 53-55 (2022).

33. Z. Tang, J. Wood, D. Smith, A. Thapa and N. Aryal. A review on constructed treatment wetlands for removal of pollutants in the agricultural runoff. Sustainability 13(24): 13578 (2021).

34. O.C. Overton, L.H. Olson, S.D. Majumder, H. Shwiyyat, M.E. Foltz and R.W. Nairn. Wetland removal mechanisms for emerging contaminants. Land 12(2): 472 (2023).

35. O.O. Babalola, O.C. Emmanuel, B.S. Adeleke, K.A. Odelade, B.C. Nwachukwu, O.E. Ayiti, T.T. Adegboyega and N.O. Igiehon. Rhizosphere microbiome cooperations: strategies for sustainable crop production. Current Microbiology 78(4): 1069-1085 (2021).

36. X.Y. Tang, Y. Yang, M.B. McBride, R. Tao, Y.N. Dai, and X.M. Zhang. Removal of chlorpyrifos in recirculating vertical flow constructed wetlands with five wetland plant species. Chemosphere 216: 195-202 (2019).

37. G. Yidong, W. Bo, G. Yongxia, L. Wen, Z. Xiaoli, and Y. Jianghua. Occurrence and fate of antibiotics in the aqueous environment and their removal by constructed wetlands in China: a review. Pedosphere 27(1): 42-51 (2017).

38. B.K. Singh and A. Walker. Microbial degradation of organophosphorus compounds. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 30(3): 428-471 (2006).

39. L. Ma, X. Dai, G. Ai, X. Zheng, Y. Zhang, C. Pan, M. Hu, C. Jiang, L. Wang, and Z. Dong. Isolation and identification of efficient malathion-degrading bacteria from deep-sea hydrothermal sediment. Microorganisms 10(9): 1797 (2022).

40. B. Sharma, A.K. Dangi, and P. Shukla. Contemporary enzyme based technologies for bioremediation: a review. Journal of Environmental Management 210: 10-22 (2018).

41. J. Wang, G. Zhang, D. Wang, Y. Zhao, L. Wu, Y. Zheng, and Q. Liu. Low-Carbon Hybrid Constructed Wetland System for Rural Domestic Sewage: Substrate–Plant–Microbe Synergy and Annual Performance. Water 17(10): 1421 (2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Vijiha Nasir, Khalid, R., Asma Jamil, & Sajida Rasheed. (2025). Treatment of Malathion by using Plant-Bacteria Consortia in Constructed Wetlands. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: B. Life and Environmental Sciences, 62(4). https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASB(62-4)1122

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.