Improving the Accuracy and Reliability of Plasma Temperature Determination in Laser‒Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASA(63-3)719Keywords:
Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy, Plasma Excitation Temperature, Boltzmann Plot, Uncertainty Analysis, Repeatability, CoCrCuNi‒Pb AlloysAbstract
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a promising analytical technique for rapid, simultaneous multielement analysis. However, shot-to-shot plasma fluctuations and measurement uncertainties can affect the accuracy and reliability of plasma excitation temperature determination. The present work proposes a statistical uncertainty‒analysis framework for improving the reliability of plasma excitation temperature determination using the Boltzmann plot method. A LIBS analysis has been carried out using different CoCrCuNi‒Pb alloy samples with varied chemical composition of major and minor elements. Pb(I) emission lines are of interest, with negligible spectral interferences and covering a wide range of upper excitation energies. For each sample, 50 LIBS spectra were recorded, and each spectrum was the average of 15 single shots. Plasma temperature is estimated using the net intensity of the selected Pb emission lines in the Boltzmann plot method. The statistical analysis of 50 temperatures was carried out to evaluate the mean value of plasma excitation temperature, standard deviation (SD), relative standard deviation (RSD), and combined uncertainty. The estimated plasma excitation temperatures using the proposed procedure were in the range from 11000 K to 13000 K with R2: 0.916 to 0.988; whereas, the SD and RSD values were in the range of 257‒300 K and 2.3‒2.4%, respectively. In addition, the Boltzmann plots were constructed using the averaged intensities for each sample, yielding analogous plasma excitation temperatures of 11300‒13800 K with R2: 0.897 to 0.971. The use of the average net intensity in the Boltzmann equation for plasma estimation provides LIBS spectral data with acceptable precision and linearity. Interestingly, both temperature calculations with raw net intensity and with average intensity are in good agreement. Therefore, the study suggests an accurate and reliable determination of plasma excitation temperature using the present in-house developed LIBS setup, which supports the reliability and repeatability of the plasma temperature determination under the experimental conditions used in this study.
References
1. L.B. Guo, D. Zhang, L.X. Sun, S.C. Yao, L. Zhang, Z.Z. Wang, Q.Q. Wang, H.B. Ding, Y. Lu, Z.Y. Hou, and Z. Wang. Development in the application of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in recent years: A review. Frontiers of Physics 16(2): 22500 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-020-1007-z
2. D.W. Hahn and N. Omenetto. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), part II: review of instrumental and methodological approaches to material analysis and applications to different fields. Applied spectroscopy 66(4): 347-419 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1366/11-06574
3. M.K. Jean-Noël, K.T. Arthur, and B. Jean-Marc. LIBS technology and its application: overview of the different research areas. Journal of Environmental Science and Public Health 4(3): 134-149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.26502/jesph.96120090
4. W. Huang, C. Niu, K. Li, N. Deng, D. Zhang, Z. Hu, J. Zhang, and L. Guo. Recent advances in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy instruments. Frontiers of Physics 21(7): 072202 (2026). https://doi.org/10.15302/frontphys.2026.072202
5. D.S. Ferreira, D.V. Babos, M.H. Lima-Filho, H.F. Castello, A.C. Olivieri, F.M. Verbi Pereira, and E.R. Pereira-Filho. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS): calibration challenges, combination with other techniques, and spectral analysis using data science. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 39(12): 2949-2973 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ja00250d
6. F. Zhao, X. Zhao, T. Jiang, R. Zhao, and F. Wu. Comprehensive study of CoCrCuNi high-entropy alloys: effects of preparation, heat treatment, computational simulation, and alloying elements. Metals 14(11): 1240 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/met14111240
7. F.J. Fortes, J. Moros, P. Lucena, L.M. Cabalín, and J.J. Laserna. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Analytical chemistry 85(2): 640-669 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac303220r
8. M.A. Ismail, H. Imam, A. Elhassan, W.T. Youniss, and M.A. Harith. LIBS limit of detection and plasma parameters of some elements in two different metallic matrices. Journal of Analytical atomic Spectrometry 19(4): 489-494 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1039/b315588a
9. V.K. Unnikrishnan, K. Alti, V.B. Kartha, C. Santhosh, G.P. Gupta, and B.M. Suri. Measurements of plasma temperature and electron density in laser-induced copper plasma by time-resolved spectroscopy of neutral atom and ion emissions. Pramana 74(6): 983‒993 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-010-0089-5
10. N. Zhang, T. Ou, M. Wang, Z. Lin, C. Lv, Y. Qin, J. Li, H. Yang, N. Zhao, and Q. Zhang. A brief review of calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Frontiers in Physics 10: 887171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.887171
11. E. Tognoni, G. Cristoforetti, S. Legnaioli, and V. Palleschi. Calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: state of the art. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 65(1): 1-14 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2009.11.006
12. A.M. Roldán, M. Pisarčík, M. Veis, M. Držík, and P. Veis. Calibration-free analysis of a tungsten-based target for diagnostics of relevant fusion materials comparing picosecond and nanosecond LIBS. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 177: 106055 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2020.106055
13. B. Bousquet, V. Gardette, V.M. Ros, R. Gaudiuso, M. Dell'Aglio, and A. De Giacomo. Plasma excitation temperature obtained with Boltzmann plot method: Significance, precision, trueness and accuracy. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 204: 106686 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2023.106686
14. L.M. John, R.C. Issac, S. Sankararaman, and K.K. Anoop. Multi-element Saha Boltzmann plot (MESBP) coupled calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (CF-LIBS): an efficient approach for quantitative elemental analysis. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 37(11): 2451-2460 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ja00218c
15. I.B. Gornushkin, S.V. Shabanov, S. Merk, E. Tognoni, and U. Panne. Effects of non-uniformity of laser induced plasma on plasma temperature and concentrations determined by the Boltzmann plot method: implications from plasma modeling. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 25(10): 1643-1653 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ja00016g
16. M.A. Baig, A. Fayyaz, R. Ahmed, Z.A. Umar, H. Asghar, U. Liaqat, R. Hedwig, and K.H. Kurniawan. Analytical techniques for elemental analysis: LIBS, LA-TOF-MS, EDX, PIXE, and XRF: A review. Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences: A. Physical and Computational Sciences 61(2): 99-112 (2024). https://doi.org/10.53560/PPASA(61-2)676
17. A. Fayyaz, M. Waqas, H. Asghar, R. Ahmed, U. Liaqat, K. Naseem, and M.A. Baig. Rapid elemental imaging of copper-bearing critical ores using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy coupled with PCA and PLS-DA. Talanta 296: 128463 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128463
18. M.A. Baig, A. Fayyaz, U. Liaqat, H. Asghar, and R. Ahmed. Signal Enhancement Techniques in LIBS-Based Experimentations. In: Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS): Chemometrics, Environmental and Forensic Applications. V.K. Singh (Ed.). Springer Cham, Switzerland pp. 143-183 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-90970-2_8
19. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Database. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form.html (accessed on 30 July 2026).
20. T.A. Alrebdi, A. Fayyaz, H. Asghar, A. Kamal, J. Iqbal, and N.K. Piracha. Chemometrics and spectroscopic analyses of peganum harmala plant’s seeds by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Applied Sciences 13(5): 2780 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052780
21. D.A. Cremers and L.J. Radziemski (Eds.). Handbook of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. John Wiley & Sons (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118567371.index
22. A. Ciucci, M. Corsi, V. Palleschi, S. Rastelli, A. Salvetti, and E. Tognoni. New procedure for quantitative elemental analysis by laser-induced plasma spectroscopy. Applied spectroscopy 53(8): 960-964 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702991947612
23. F. Poggialini, B. Campanella, B. Cocciaro, G. Lorenzetti, V. Palleschi, and S. Legnaioli. Catching up on calibration-free LIBS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 38(9): 1751-1771 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ja00130j
24. J. Guezenoc, A. Gallet-Budynek, and B. Bousquet. Critical review and advices on spectral-based normalization methods for LIBS quantitative analysis. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 160: 105688 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2019.105688
25. J. Wang, M. Shi, P. Zheng, and S. Xue. Quantitative analysis of lead in tea samples by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Journal of Applied Spectroscopy 84(1): 188-193 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-017-0448-9
26. U. Aydin, P. Roth, C.D. Gehlen, and R. Noll. Spectral line selection for time-resolved investigations of laser-induced plasmas by an iterative Boltzmann plot method. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 63(10): 1060-1065 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2008.08.003
27. A.S. Altowyan, A. El-Hussein, H.A. Ahmed, H.H. Faqih, A.S. Amein, A.M. Mostafa, and M.M. ElFaham. Influence of the laser wavelength on the self-absorption of Cu and Ni spectral lines by using LIBS technique. Optical Materials 131: 112731 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112731
